A constructed linguistic universe (I)A new linguistic paradigmA premise must be testable
A true Emperor cannot be discredited by any disbelieving personAbout China's language policyAbout Chinese Etymology
About PreBabel (Chinese)About Sapir-Whorf hypothesisAbout heavily inflecting or agglutinating languages
About large and complex systemAbout memory anchors on learning a languageAbout tests for PreBabel
About the EsperantoAbout the differences among languagesAbout words and concepts of one language are grouped differently in another language
Axiomatic domain, theory and systemBenefits of PreBabelBy a chance, He becomes I
Can PreBabel (language x) be learned easier than the language x itself?Can PreBabel encompass the Martian language?Can any language be without verbs?
Can any theory be based on only two highly atypical examples?Can linguistics be justified with math laws?Can the parts be larger than the whole?
Construced linguistic universe (II)Constructed linguistic universe (III)Constructed linguistic universe (IV)
Constructed linguistic universe (V)Constructed linguistic universe (VI)Constructed linguistic universe (VII)
Discovering the PreBabel principleHow and when can PreBabel (Proper) emerge?Is English a universal language?
Is a universal language possible?Isomorphism of all natural languagesMore about intuitiveness
More about the EsperantoMore about the construction of the Lii character setMore of traditional Chinese etymology vs PreBabel (Chinese)
New linguistic lawsPB root word set is invented, not discoveredPhonological reconstruction vs PreBabel (Chinese)
PreBabel WikiPreBabel epistemology: the Occam's razorPreBabel logic a, b and c
PreBabel methodology I -- equivalent transformationPublished works on PreBabel (Chinese)Reasons being in the dark
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis revisitedSummary of constructed linguistic universeSummary of questions about PreBabel
Test procedure for validating the PreBabelThe PreBabel proceduresThe PreBabel process is as easy as 1, 2 and 3
The Private Language Thesis and the types of languagesThe Universal LanguageThe attractor theorem and a universal language
The choices of roots for PreBabelThe criteria for a universal languageThe debut of PreBabel (Chinese) at AP Annual Conference 2007 (CollegeBoard)
The first constructed language, the Lii character setThe fuzzy logic and the root word setThe history of finding the universal language root word set
The innate meaning of a word token and its semantic meaningThe method of handling a chaotic system, such as among natural languagesThe regression encoding procedure for a universal language
The two step PreBabel proceduresTheoretical framework for a universal languageTraditional Chinese etymology vs PreBabel (Chinese)
Types of conlang and more on traditional Chinese etymology vs PreBabel (Chinese)Via PreBabel to learn any second language is to learn two instead of one, then why do it?
File:Example.jpgFile:Feature.pngFile:Forum new.gif
File:Placeholder item.pngFile:Placeholder location.pngFile:Placeholder other.png
File:Placeholder person.png